|
Written by A FLA! Writing Group
|
|
Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:18 |
This article was originally published on the blog THE FUCKIN' LOUDEST ASIANS
In a six-month period, there were two alleged suicides of young US-born Chinese men serving in the US military occupation of Afghanistan. 
Marine Lance Corporal Harry Lew died in Helmand province. Army Private Danny Chen died in Kandahar province. The first was from California. The second was born and raised in New York City’s Chinatown, the son of a cook and a garment worker.
Before they died, each of them was subjected to physical abuse and brutal humiliation, not from the people of Afghanistan who they were sent to fight and subjugate by the US ruling class, but from their fellow troops in the US occupying forces. In Danny Chen’s case, it has also come to light that he was the victim of racist and anti-Chinese harassment by his army superiors, one of them with a record as an attempted rapist.
Who Is the Real Enemy?
Who is the real enemy? Danny Chen signed up to fight for his country (he thought) against enemies in Afghanistan (he thought) and ended up dead by the actions of racist US troops. It wasn’t Afghans who dragged Danny from his bed across a floor. It wasn’t Afghans who made Danny crawl on the ground while pelting him with rocks. It wasn’t Afghans who tortured Danny, forcing him to hold water in his mouth while hanging upside down.
Danny Chen met the real enemy in Kandahar. He discovered that this enemy isn’t from Kandahar and isn’t Afghan. This enemy isn’t Iraqi or Palestinian. Danny learned that the real enemy is born from the same country where he was born, speaks the same language he spoke, wears the same uniform he wore, and salutes the same red-white-and-blue American flag he saluted.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 18 January 2012 18:25 |
|
Written by Tom Attaway
|
|
Thursday, 01 December 2011 04:08 |
If the Occupation movement is about uniting the overwhelming majority of oppressed people against the minority of exploiters, then it’s no wonder that it has taken root and flourished in the city of Oakland. A working-class city built by Asian and Black labor, Oakland has seen median wages fall by $2000 since the recession began; about 40% of the population lives in economic hardship. Meanwhile the city has continued closing schools, shutting down libraries and cutting services, with no end in sight.
So it’s no surprise that hundreds of people came down to take part in the first gathering of Occupy Oakland on October 10. They came with stories of lost jobs, foreclosures and unbearable debt. They came to talk about political corruption, corporate domination, and the ruthless behavior of the Oakland Police Department -- a group whose brutality costs the city almost $6 million/year in legal settlement costs.
|
|
Written by David Bacon
|
|
Wednesday, 30 November 2011 02:32 |
In the hundred and fifty year history of workers in the San Francisco Bay Area, the watershed event was one that happened 70 years ago – the San Francisco general strike. That year sailors, longshoremen and other maritime workers shut down all the ports on the west coast, trying to form a union and end favoritism, low wages, and grueling 10- and 12-hour days. Shipowners deployed tanks and guns on the waterfront, and tried to break the strike.
At the peak of this bitter labor war, police fired into crowds of strikers, killing two union activists. Then workers shut down the entire city in a general strike, and for four days nothing moved in San Francisco. The strike gave workers a sense of power described in a verse in the union song Solidarity Forever: “Without our brain and muscle, not a single wheel can turn.”
The strike marked the end of a period in which, for seventy years, the efforts of workers to form unions were met with violence and firings. By the end of the 1930s, the International Longshore and Warehouse Union was one of the strongest in the nation, workers had a hiring hall instead of a humiliating shapeup in which they had to beg for jobs, and workers on both sides of the bay were busy building other unions, as well as political organizations that eventually elected mayors and sent pro-worker candidates to Congress. The strike marked the beginning of our modern labor movement.
One product of the rising power of unions was the development of the workers compensation system to ensure that injured and sick workers would receive enough compensation from employers to survive.
|
|
Written by Moonanum James and Mahtowin Munro
|
|
Tuesday, 29 November 2011 06:46 |
This article was written by Moonanum James and Mahtowin Munro and published at People of Color Organize.
By Moonanum James and Mahtowin Munro. Mahtowin Munro (Lakota) and Moonanum James (Wampanoag) are co-leaders of United American Indians of New England.
Every year since 1970, United American Indians of New England have organized the National Day of Mourning observance in Plymouth at noon on Thanksgiving Day. Every year, hundreds of Native people and our supporters from all four directions join us. Every year, including this year, Native people from throughout the Americas will speak the truth about our history and about current issues and struggles we are involved in.
Why do hundreds of people stand out in the cold rather than sit home eating turkey and watching football? Do we have something against a harvest festival?
Of course not. But Thanksgiving in this country — and in particular in Plymouth –is much more than a harvest home festival. It is a celebration of the pilgrim mythology.
According to this mythology, the pilgrims arrived, the Native people fed them and welcomed them, the Indians promptly faded into the background, and everyone lived happily ever after.
The truth is a sharp contrast to that mythology.
Read more
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 01 December 2011 06:36 |
|
Written by Freedom Road Publications Commitee
|
|
Thursday, 01 December 2011 04:42 |
Here are a few videos and pieces we'd recommend for reflection on Thanksgiving:
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 01 December 2011 05:07 |
|
Written by Freedom Road Publications Commitee
|
|
Wednesday, 30 November 2011 03:03 |
This is not our usual article, but this past month there were two news pieces worth noting, making their way around facebook:
Have you read news or notes you'd like to see here? Drop us a line at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
!
|
|
Last Updated on Thursday, 01 December 2011 06:35 |
|
|
Written by William Rogers
|
|
Monday, 31 October 2011 03:23 |
Our Texas comrades recommended this article from the Left Labor Reporter as an update on the Occupy movement in Austin. Have local updates? Send 'em our way! Reprinted with the author's permission.
Five hundred union members marched through downtown Austin Sunday chanting, “What do we want? Union jobs” and “They got bailed out, we got sold out” during the Occupy Austin Labor Solidarity March. Ironworkers, sheet metal workers, electricians, telecom workers, and transit workers marched alongside teachers, state and local government workers, and EMS technicians.
Postal workers carried signs reading, “Save Our Postal Service, Save Saturday Deliveries” in reference to the United States Postal Service’s proposal to cut mail delivery services and lay off thousands of postal workers. Teamsters carried signs reading “Stop the War on Workers.”
Phil Bunker, vice-president of Teamsters Local 657 explained to me how the war on workers is affecting local Teamsters who work for Yellow Freight, a regional trucking company. Recently, the company threatened to file bankruptcy unless the union agreed to re-open and re-negotiate the contract. When the union reluctantly agreed, the company reduced wages by 15 percent, stopped making contributions to the workers’ pension fund, and reduced their health care benefit. “The members are very demoralized now,” Bunker said.
Read more...
|
|
Written by the National Executive Committee of FRSO/OSCL
|
|
Sunday, 30 October 2011 17:09 |
It may be a bit of a cliché, but it bears saying: a single spark has in fact lit a prairie fire. An enormous one.
The last year has witnessed what appears to be the beginning of a new historical period. From the ferment in the Arab world; to the upsurge in Wisconsin; to the outpourings in Greece, Chile, Spain and other countries; and now to the Occupy movement that has spread across the US and beyond, we have clearly left the period that started with the fall of the Soviet Bloc. The last twenty-plus years was characterized by the supposed triumph of capitalism and the crisis of socialism, what the Right called “the end of history”. We have now entered a new worldwide era of popular upsurge. One of the indicators of how pregnant the moment is with possibility is the fact that the Occupy movement spread across the country even while it was still quite modestly sized for a New York City protest. It was only after it started to become a nationwide movement that we started to see many thousands of people hitting the streets of NYC.
This new period was actually in development a decade ago with the brief rise of the global justice movement. However, the 9/11 attacks short-circuited that motion and threw the world into war and repression for ten long years. One result of this decade-long sidetrack is that the contradictions developing within capitalism that the global justice movement sprang up to combat, grew even deeper and more profound, culminating in the current grave economic crisis. This is why the worldwide motion we’ve seen over the last year has been so sudden and broad.
In retrospect, it’s not surprising that it took three years from the beginning of the current crisis for large-scale protest to kick off. The Great Depression began with the stock market crash of 1929, but it wasn’t until 1932 that massive political struggle began to flare up. When a crisis begins, people’s first response is in fact to lower their expectations in the face of the new conditions. It takes time for the new situation to be absorbed as the new normality and for the contradiction between reality and people’s expectations to open wide. We have now reached that point.
|
|
Written by Jose M.
|
|
Sunday, 30 October 2011 17:44 |
Here are some great suggestions for ways to directly engage with your local Occupy movement from a comrade who has been participating with Occupy Las Vegas, which is currently a permitted encampment protest with about 20 tents and 40-100 participants at any given time. He's
been a part of the group, participating in general assembly meetings and
sleeping in a tent, but still going to work during the day.
Here are his ideas for socialist participation:
- Make LEFT signs: We used dumpstered cardboard and cheap paint to
make about 50 signs for the last march with slogans like "class war/
end capitalism before it ends las vegas", "Occupy Wall St not Palestine",
"We can't afford billionaires", "They took our houses, let's take their
power", etc. Our signs were the only ones that were explicitly
anti-capitalist and they were well received. Many people took them
and used them in the march. This is a quick and easy way to shift
messaging to the left.
- Stock the people's libraries: A common feature of the camps are
library booths or tents. We printed off some classics — The Communist
Manifesto, The Mass Strike by Rosa Luxemberg, etc.; some resources on
anti-oppression strategies, some random radical stuff like the
Zapatista declarations and Left Turn articles. The local news
reported on the alarming presence of the Communist Manifesto at the
camp!
|
|
Written by Bill Gallegos
|
|
Sunday, 30 October 2011 15:57 |
Introduction
As the world careens towards an uncertain future, this much is certain: if a genuine revolutionary alternative to capitalism is not realized, we may witness the emergence and dominance of a global regime of horrendous barbarism, the end-of-days festival heralding the death of Mother Earth.
We are already witness to portents of the ecological barbarism which an unrestrained capitalism inevitably produces: in unprecedented series of droughts, floods, wildfires, hurricanes, tornadoes -- all the inevitable result of an atmosphere choking on a geometrically-increasing carbon burden, of a systemic pollution and toxicification of lakes, rivers, aquifers, waterways, and oceans destroying both the food and water supply necessary for the sustenance of all life, the erosion and pestilential chemical destruction of arable lands, or their conversion (a la China) into gated and militarized playgrounds for a hedonistic bourgeoisie; the apocalyptic species loss, greater than anything witnesses by our Earth Mother in 65 million years (most of the planet’s fisheries have been depleted by over-fishing or destroyed by pollution), the polar icecaps and other massive frozen water supplies are melting at a rate even the most highly-advanced computer systems have failed to predict.
This unprecedented and interconnected series of environmental events constitute what is referred to as the global ecological crisis, or what we might call the death throes of Mother Earth. The ecological crisis is itself intertwined with the global economic crisis, whose Marxist terms “stagnation due to the declining rate of profit” fails completely to capture the horror of a system that causes 24,000 children to die each day due to hunger or completely avoidable illness.
|
|
Written by Meizhu Lui
|
|
Monday, 31 October 2011 00:50 |
The following is an excerpt from an article on Ask a Socialist
I made a living working for non-profits for nearly 20 years doing community organizing and blah blah blah, so you could well accuse me of biting the hand that has fed me. But you could also say the same of a union member exposing the damages done by their company.
In this case, it’s a whole sector that needs examination, especially by those who choose to work in it. “Non-profits.” Makes it sound like, hooray, they are outside of the capitalist system doing good for the little people. So we progressives and radicals, particularly those of us who are not from the working class, flock to jobs that purport to do God’s work or Marx’s work or Alinsky’s work or whomever – at least it’s not Mammon’s work. (And while organizing jobs may not make you rich, they pay better than working at a nursing home or McDonald’s, jobs working class people are more likely to be stuck with.) Other countries don’t call it the non-profit sector, they call it the non-governmental sector, which may be more clear: this sector is not some third way, outside of the capitalist system.
There have always been “voluntary” organizations, groups of people banding together for common projects. Like providing services. Like political change. Like revolution. Organizations that didn’t need anyone’s permission for anything. Non-profits are a form of voluntary organization, but they are defined by their federal tax status, exempt since their work does not financially benefit private individuals. To get the exemption, the tax code also puts in place numerous rules that an organization must follow, including allowing government scrutiny. “While the idea of exempting charitable organizations from paying taxes is old, it was in 1954, the year of the McCarthy hearings which aimed to root out and destroy communist sympathizers and progressives through defamation and scare tactics (after successful anti-capitalist organizing by the above throughout the 30s and 40’s) that the tax code was revised to say that no political activities (except an “insubstantial amount” of non-partisan education on issues) were allowed by organizations seeking tax exemption. The main upshot over time has been the growth of social service not social change organizations. There’s a political history, as with all laws, in 501(c)3 of the Internal Revenue Code.”
Read more...
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 31 October 2011 02:20 |
|
Written by Raf
|
|
Sunday, 30 October 2011 15:26 |
October is Domestic Violence Awareness Month. As a communist who has been working as a domestic violence hotline counselor for two years, I believe it is incredibly challenging but also imperative that we bring domestic violence into the public sphere. We need to do this to create communities in which we all have power over our own lives and feel safe and supported in our homes.
During the process of training to be a hotline counselor, I learned the importance of active listening and creative thinking. I believe, in accordance with my politics, that my purpose as a counselor is to push for the self-determination of the caller. In my role within the non-governmental organization (NGO) I work with, I am there to listen and encourage the person experiencing violence to think through her1 solutions. My instinct may be to tell her to leave the relationship, but her experiences may tell her something else. Her kids, her finances, or her own emotional vulnerability may depend on the relationship surviving. It is not my life and not up to me to judge.
As an active listener, I sharpened the skill of choosing words and phrases carefully. Women tend to be better at that because they are often trained, through oppression and socialized gender roles, to be tactful and perceptive of social cues. Men have a harder time being considerate of others' feelings because they are socialized to speak their mind, and society tends to encourage that behavior. But I believe that everyone, comrade or counselor, should be careful with their words. Words can damage and abuse, or words can affirm and liberate.
|
|
Written by FRSO/OSCL
|
|
Saturday, 08 October 2011 22:35 |

If you haven't been living under a rock for the past month you've probably heard about the wave of protests across the United States set off by Occupy Wall Street on September 17. By now you've probably seen them in your own city: Occupy Together lists events in more than one thousand cities in North America and elsewhere around the world. Some have spoken of a new movement like the anti-apartheid and anti-globalization movements of the '80s and '90s; others look back to 1968 or beyond for comparisons.
For socialists and leftists of all stripes these "occupations" have been both exciting and challenging, raising new questions every day. Can this movement grow and sustain itself until it can challenge the political status quo in the US? What are the politics of the occupations and their likely political trajectory? As socialists, as members and leaders in mass organizations, as community members and victims and resisters of the Wall Street parasites and their system -- how do we take part in the movement and in this rare historical moment?
Here are a few things that we've been reading to help sharpen our thinking around some of these questions.
- Theory, tactics and practice: In So Real It Hurts: Notes on Occupy Wall Street, Manissa Maharawal writes about her experiences at the Occupy Wall Street general assembly. McKenzie Wark writes about challenges and opportunities for
OWS in How To Occupy An Abstraction and Earl McCabe writes about tactics and goals at the blog Permanent Crisis. A piece by "SKS" discusses the politico-military dimension of Occupy Wall Street's "leaderless resistance".
- Occupy/unoccupy: Many people have written about the contradictions of a movement calling for "occupations" on land which was stolen from its inhabitants -- and is still being occupied by the descendants and beneficiaries of that theft. Michelle Merrill writes about it in Occupied Lands, and "Tequila Sovereign" writes more about the history of Manhattan and the Lenape who were its original inhabitants in her post Manna-hatta. Another challenge to the perceived whiteness of Occupy Wall Street comes from Occupy The Hood, as Julianne Escobedo Shepherd reports at AlterNet.
- International solidarity: As Occupy Wall Street was inspired by the wave of revolutions in the Middle East and North Africa and movements against austerity in Europe, so in turn it has inspired solidarity actions across the globe. The Maoist website Utopia reports on a gathering in Zhengzhou, China, where protestors called for "Determined Support for the American People's Great 'Wall Street Revolution!'" (Summary in English here, original full report in Chinese here.) Participants in the movement of the indignados in Spain have linked their struggle to that in the US and called for a global day of action on October 15.
- Politics and prospects: Many arguments about this movement center on the "demandlessness" of the occupiers. Should they have a list of specific demands? What should they be? This leads to even bigger questions: where is the movement going? What should it strive for and what can it achieve? Vijay Prashad offers some analysis of the movement and its place in the politics and society of the US in Zombie Capitalism and the Post-Obama Left. Matt Sledge writes about occupiers resisting co-optation in a piece for the Huffington Post. At Fire on the Mountain, Jimmy Higgins admits he was wrong about Occupy Wall Street and looks to the bigger picture.
- Stray thoughts: Sarah Jaffe discusses the class implications of the call for protestors to 'know your history.' Time collects 50 of the best photos from Occupy Wall Street. Sady Doyle tells stories from her life that challenge the idea of the 99% versus the 1%. And at The Nation, Richard Kim says We Are All Human Microphones Now.

We want to hear your thoughts too. Send us an email at
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
-- or better yet, find us in the streets.
|
|
Last Updated on Tuesday, 11 October 2011 01:52 |
|
Written by Jimmy Higgins
|
|
Wednesday, 19 October 2011 01:57 |
This piece was written by Jimmy Higgins and originally posted at the blog Fire on the Mountain.
I was wrong.
And just how wrong I was still remains to be seen.
When the Occupy Wall Street! action was announced and even after it started, I thought it had FAIL written all over it. The core was a few score young, mainly white, activists from the radical youth milieu with plenty of demonstration experience but limited ties in the people's movements and communities of NYC. The messaging was vague, the tactical implications of the call to Occupy! even vaguer. This, I thought, was bound to be a nothingburger.
 Now just three weeks later, it is clear that Occupy Wall Street! has slapped the defibrillator paddles to a constellation of social movements which have been on the critical list since at least the run-up to the 2008 election and is drawing thousands new to activism into motion. The spirit, determination and self-organization which characterized the Wisconsin uprising of last winter have gone nation-wide. And this time the struggle is not a desperate battle to turn back an ambush.
Because it has roared into existence so quickly, has spread so spontaneously and is still evolving so rapidly--new slogans and memes supersede the old almost daily--almost everybody I’ve talked to who identifies with OWS! feels that all of us 99%ers are playing catch-up ball, trying to relate to our own upsurge.
Here are three brief points roughed out during hours at Liberty Square (or Zucotti Park or whatever we are calling it today) and then refined at yesterday’s mass march. I offer them for orientation purposes as we attempt to figure out what’s going on--and where to go next.
|
|
Last Updated on Monday, 31 October 2011 02:18 |
|
Written by Freedom Road Publications Commission
|
|
Saturday, 08 October 2011 12:59 |
We are excited by the potential the Occupy Wall Street/Occupy Together protests embody; stay tuned to see more reports from the ground. As a first dispatch, here's a piece our New York/New Jersey comrades are circulating at Occupy Wall Street (OWS) providing some context on the local struggles against police brutality reaching beyond the protest arrests.
These two pieces are worth checking out for background (h/t to Portside):
Have a local report to share? We want to hear it! Please send it our way:
This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it
|
|
Written by Charlie Orrock
|
|
Friday, 07 October 2011 16:44 |
Fred Shuttlesworth, the pillar of the southern civil rights movement,
died October 5, 2011 at age 89. Some of you have had the very wonderful
experience of working with him as I have. While the mainstream press has
widely noted his passing, most of the accounts don’t tell the full
story. We have an obligation to do that.
He led the Birmingham Movement and was viewed by observers of the
struggle in Alabama as the one who made the victories possible. His
hard work made household names of Drs King and Abernathy. He and his
family were the victims of repeated bombings and near-fatal mob
violence. Martin King said often that Fred inevitably was going to be
the movement's martyr. Although nationally he didn't have the name
recognition of others that were familiar to the public, that was not
true in Alabama. The great mass of people who were challenging Jim Crow
certainly knew him and so did the defenders of Southern Apartheid-- Bull
Connor and his police-Klan axis.
|
|
Last Updated on Saturday, 08 October 2011 03:56 |
|
|